Back to Blog
Product11 min read

Building Dashboards That Actually Get Used

Most dashboards are abandoned within months. Here's how to build ones that become indispensable.

James Morrison, Product Manager

James Morrison

Product Manager

Share:
Well-designed business intelligence dashboard showing clean layout with key metrics, actionable insights, and user-friendly navigation demonstrating best practices
Effective Dashboard Design: Clean, focused, and built around user decisions rather than data dumps

I've shipped 23 dashboards over the past eight years. Twelve of them failed. By "failed" I mean: within six months, usage dropped to near zero, and stakeholders went back to asking for ad-hoc reports.

Here's what I learned from the failures—and the successes.

Why Dashboards Fail

Before building, understand the failure modes:

1. The "Too Much" Dashboard

Symptoms: 15+ charts, multiple scroll depths, everything is important.

Why it happens: Stakeholders each want "their" metric included. No one says no.

Why it fails: Decision fatigue. Users open it, feel overwhelmed, close it.

2. The "Wrong Question" Dashboard

Symptoms: Beautiful charts, impressive filters, technically excellent.

Why it happens: Building started before understanding what decisions users need to make.

Why it fails: It answers questions nobody is asking.

3. The "Out of Date" Dashboard

Symptoms: Data is hours, days, or weeks old. Users don't trust it.

Why it happens: Technical constraints or poor data pipeline design.

Why it fails: Users check the dashboard, then check the source anyway. Soon they skip the dashboard.

4. The "One User" Dashboard

Symptoms: Perfectly designed for the executive who requested it.

Why it happens: Only talked to one stakeholder.

Why it fails: That person gets what they need. Everyone else's needs go unmet.

The Research Phase (Don't Skip This)

Before any design work, I now spend 2-3 weeks on research. This single change transformed my success rate.

Talk to 5-8 Potential Users

Not their managers. Not the executive sponsor. The people who will actually look at this daily.

Ask:

  • What decisions do you make repeatedly?
  • What information do you need for those decisions?
  • Where do you currently get that information?
  • What's annoying about the current process?

Shadow Users

Watch them do their current workflow. You'll see inefficiencies they don't mention because they're used to them.

I once watched a sales manager copy data from three different tools into a spreadsheet every Monday. She didn't mention it because "that's just how it works." The dashboard I built automated that entirely.

Find the "Aha" Moment

What single insight would make someone's day easier? Start there. A dashboard that does one thing brilliantly beats one that does ten things adequately.

Design Principles That Work

1. Start with One Screen

Challenge yourself to fit everything on one screen without scrolling. This forces prioritization.

If you must scroll, the first screen should contain the most critical information.

2. Lead with the Number

Don't make users hunt for the headline. The main KPI should be the first thing they see—big, clear, and with enough context to interpret (vs. target, vs. last period).

3. Progressive Disclosure

Surface-level view shows the summary. Clicking reveals detail. Advanced filters hidden until needed.

Most users never need the detail. Power users can access it without cluttering the default view.

4. Actionable > Interesting

Every chart should suggest an action. If it doesn't lead to a decision, question whether it belongs.

Bad: "Website traffic over time"

Better: "Traffic vs. goal (take action if below yellow line)"

5. Update Frequency Matches Decisions

If decisions are made monthly, daily updates add noise, not value.

If decisions are made hourly, daily data is useless.

Match the refresh rate to how often people check it and act on it.

The MVP Dashboard

Start minimal. Here's the structure I use:

Header

  • Dashboard title and last updated time
  • Key metric in large format
  • Target or comparison

Main Section

  • 2-3 charts maximum
  • Each answers a specific question
  • Clear hierarchy (one chart is primary)

Optional Detail Section

  • Collapsible or below the fold
  • Supports deep-dives when needed

No Filters Initially

Yes, really. Filters add complexity. Launch without them and see if users actually need them. Often they don't.

Building for Adoption

A great dashboard that no one opens is worthless. Plan for adoption from day one.

1. Find Champions

Identify 2-3 early users who will actually use it and give feedback. Build for them first.

2. Integrate into Workflows

Can the dashboard appear where people already work? A Slack notification with the daily number. An email digest. Embedded in the tool they already use.

Asking people to open a new tab is asking a lot.

3. Start with a Problem

Launch with: "Remember how you had to pull that report manually? Now it's here automatically."

Don't launch with: "Here's a new dashboard with lots of features."

4. Kill the Old Way

If the old spreadsheet still exists, people will use it. Deprecate the old solution when the new one is ready.

5. Measure Dashboard Usage

Track opens, time spent, filter usage. Low usage is feedback. It means something is wrong.

Iteration After Launch

The first version is never right. Plan for iteration.

Week 1: Daily Check-ins

Talk to users every day. What's confusing? What's missing? What's unnecessary?

Week 2-4: Weekly Reviews

Have users built habits? What questions are they asking that the dashboard doesn't answer?

Month 2: Formal Review

Usage analytics. User interviews. Decide what to add, remove, or change.

Ongoing: Monthly Pulse

Brief check-in. Is it still relevant? Has the business changed?

Red Flags and How to Fix Them

"Can you add..."

Too many addition requests = original scope unclear. Go back to core questions.

"The data doesn't look right"

Trust is fragile. Investigate immediately. One unexplained discrepancy can kill adoption.

Low usage but no complaints

People are too polite to complain. Proactively ask: "If you had to rebuild this, what would you change?"

The "owner" stops caring

Every dashboard needs an accountable owner. If they move on, assign someone new or sunset the dashboard.

Tools and Technology

The tool matters less than the process. I've built successful dashboards in:

  • Excel (yes, really)
  • Google Sheets
  • Tableau
  • Power BI
  • Custom web apps
  • AI-powered tools like ChartGen.ai

The best tool is the one your users can access and trust.

What matters:

  • Reliable data refresh
  • Fast load times
  • Accessible on devices users have
  • Maintainable by the team

Case Study: The Dashboard That Worked

A B2B SaaS company asked for a "customer health dashboard."

Initial request: 40+ metrics across product usage, support tickets, billing, and NPS.

Research finding: Customer Success Managers actually needed to answer one question each morning: "Which customers need attention today?"

Final design: One page. List of customers sorted by "health score." Three indicators per customer: usage trend, support sentiment, payment status. Click to expand details.

Result: 94% daily active usage after 6 months. CSMs said it cut their morning routine from 45 minutes to 10 minutes.

Final Thought

The goal isn't to build a dashboard. It's to make someone's job easier.

Start there. Work backwards. And don't be afraid to ship something small that people actually use.

A simple dashboard that gets opened daily beats a sophisticated one that gets ignored.

dashboardsproduct designuser researchdata visualizationanalytics

Ready to create better charts?

Put these insights into practice. Generate professional visualizations in seconds with ChartGen.ai.

Try ChartGen Free